Browse thread
Extending modules and signatures
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-20 (05:18) |
From: | Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Extending modules and signatures |
Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> writes: > On Sunday 19 April 2009 22:36:12 Ashish Agarwal wrote: >> Having the compiler introduce module type names automatically from mli >> files would be very helpful, and I don't see any disadvantages. > > Some people contest the idea that files should automatically convey module > information at all (SML does not). Indeed, should directories convey > something as well? I thought they did. a.ml: module B = struct let foo = ... end and a/b.ml : let foo = ... could actually be equivalent and both result in A.B.foo. MfG Goswin