Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-04-03 (15:04)
From: Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strings

Le 3 avr. 09 à 16:46, Jon Harrop a écrit :

> Just because my OCaml programs were mutating strings and translating  
> that into
> F# is non-trivial if the string is shared or big. In essence, I've  
> always
> used OCaml's strings as a more efficient byte array. In fact, the best
> translation to F# is often to use byte arrays as a replacement for  
> strings.

So immutable strings are not a "PITA" you are just using them for  
something they should not be taken for (mutable byte arrays).