[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-09 (10:13) |
From: | Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@m...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] class type param constraint |
From: Radzevich Belevich <radzevich.belevich@gmail.com> > class [ 'c ] a = > object(self) > constraint 'c = < .. > > method as_c = (self :> 'c) > method id = Oo.id self > end ;; > class ['a] a : > object ('a) > constraint 'a = < as_c : 'a; id : int; .. > > method as_c : 'a > method id : int > end > ================ > > Why type 'c must have methods "as_c" and "id" ? This may be a bit confusing, but the .. in your constraint on 'c means that no actual subtyping will occur when you use this type as target. Indeed, if the constraint was left unchanged, it would mean that by choosing an arbitrary instance, you could use the as_c method to convert an object of type "t a" to any "t". Since no subtyping occurs, (self :> 'c) is just equivalent to (self : 'c) (i.e. unify 'c with the type of self). As a result, you get object ('a) ... method as_c : 'a ... end Jacques