Browse thread
pattern matching and records vs tuples
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Martin Jambon <martin.jambon@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] pattern matching and records vs tuples |
Yaron Minsky wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 5:30 AM, Martin Jambon
> <martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org <mailto:martin.jambon@ens-lyon.org>> wrote:
>
> blue storm wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com
> <mailto:yminsky@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > That part is achieved by the pa_records [1] syntax extension.
> > To my knowledge, it has not been port to post-3.10 camlp4 yet, but if
> > you're interested, I could probably do it.
> >
> > [1] http://oandrieu.nerim.net/ocaml/#pa_records
>
> It's in the works for the next release of OCaml, according to Xavier
> Leroy's
> talk at the OCaml meeting in Grenoble (Feb 2009).
>
>
> What's in the works? The lighter record syntax (let { foo; bar } = x)
> or the exhaustiveness check on record matches? I vaguely remember
> hearing something about the former, but not the latter.
The syntax { foo; bar }.
--
http://mjambon.com/