English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-04-05 (04:22)
From: Edgar Friendly <thelema314@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strings
Jon Harrop wrote:
> On Saturday 04 April 2009 22:51:50 Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
>> The beauty of ocaml strings is that they are really compact. An ocaml
>> string on 32bit is 5-8 bytes longer than the contained string and 9-16
>> bytes on 64bit.
> The ugliness is that 16Mb limit. I assume those limits have been removed in 
> batteries?!
Our implementation of ropes (well, really Mauricio Fernandez's) has a
limit of ~700MB in 32-bit and 220GB in 64-bit.  Users that need more
than that will have to recompile batteries with a larger
'Rope.max-height' constant.