[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-08 (11:36) |
From: | Jérémie Dimino <jeremie@d...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] storing object in record |
Le mercredi 08 avril 2009 à 12:29 +0200, Michael a écrit : > > There is no value of type: forall 'a. #baseclass as 'a. > > is this similar? : > > type 'a xx = 'a constraint 'a = < asBase: baseObject; .. > ;; > > (why does: type 'a xx = < asBase: baseObject; ..> as 'a not work instead? ) No, [type 'a xx = 'a constraint 'a = < asBase: baseObject; .. >] just means that ['a] must match [< asBase : baseObject; .. >]. Actually constraints are just inlined: # type 'a t = 'a constraint 'a = _ * _;; type 'a t = 'a constraint 'a = 'b * 'c # let f (x : 'a t) = ();; val f : ('a * 'b) t -> unit = <fun> If you write [type 'a xx = < asBase: baseObject; ..>] (with or without [as 'a]), then you have an unbound variable in the type definition (the [..]). > type 'a r = { state: 'a xx };; > > gives: > type 'a r = { state : 'a xx; } constraint 'a = < asBase : baseObject; .. > > > > so the record holds objects with an asBase method and more, isn't this the > same as #baseObject? [#baseObject] is an abbreviation for [< asBase : baseObject; .. >]. Jérémie