Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Strings
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Strings
> I found immutable strings to be a PITAin what way?


On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:

>
> I read that batteries included provides first-class rope-based strings and
> I
> was just reading up on some horror stories about immutable strings on
> StackOverflow. This made me wonder what people's thoughts are about mutable
> vs immutable strings?
>
> I had never thought about it until I started porting my OCaml code to F#
> where
> strings are immutable and I found immutable strings to be a PITA. Immutable
> array-based strings seem pointless to me but I'd still appreciate an
> immutable rope-based string...
>
> --
> Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
> http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e
>
> _______________________________________________
> Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management:
> http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list
> Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>