Browse thread
Strings
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-03 (14:18) |
From: | Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Strings |
> I found immutable strings to be a PITAin what way? On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > > I read that batteries included provides first-class rope-based strings and > I > was just reading up on some horror stories about immutable strings on > StackOverflow. This made me wonder what people's thoughts are about mutable > vs immutable strings? > > I had never thought about it until I started porting my OCaml code to F# > where > strings are immutable and I found immutable strings to be a PITA. Immutable > array-based strings seem pointless to me but I'd still appreciate an > immutable rope-based string... > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >