Browse thread
Strings
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-04 (11:34) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Strings |
On Saturday 04 April 2009 12:12:52 David Teller wrote: > The bad thing is that, whenever you have to return text in an otherwise > functional program, you need to enter "mutable array of bytes" land. You > can't just assume that the user isn't going to modify that string, > because, they can, possibly by accident, and any invariant relying on > the fact that your strings can't change are going to be broken. In > particular, any StringSet, any StringMap, etc. Sure but that is no different to arrays and an ArraySet, ArrayMap etc. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e