Browse thread
pattern matching and records vs tuples
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-04-14 (16:40) |
From: | Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] pattern matching and records vs tuples |
Yoann Padioleau <padator@wanadoo.fr> writes: > Hi, > > I've found that while records provide advantages over tuples, > they also have disadvantages when it comes to evolution issues. > If I decide to evolve code using a tuple type, for instance adding > new information and so extend a 4-uple in a 5-uple, then the compiler > will tell me all the places that I need to update, which is good. > If I use records instead, and have 4 fields, and I want to add again > some new information in a new field, then the way the compiler works > right now will not help me at all. E.g with this code > > type record = { > field1: int; > field2: int; > } > let foo = function > { field1 = v1; field2 = v2 } -> ... > > > If I extend record with a new field field3, then ocaml will > not warn me and tell me to modify also the 'foo' function :( On the other hand that is a verry good thing. let set_field1 r x = { r with field1 = x } let set_field2 r x = { r with field2 = x } Try doing that with tuples and then add a 3rd, 4th, 5th field. I have to say I didn't even know you could match a record partially or have ever wanted to match a record at all. I use record only when I have a collection of otherwise independent values. As such any matching will be done on a single component of the record but never pairs of them. At least I can't remember having done so before. MfG Goswin