Browse thread
questions
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Kuba Ober <ober.14@o...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] questions |
On Apr 1, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby (R12y) wrote: > FALCON Gilles RD-RESA-LAN wrote: >> I totally agree that it would be pleasant to have more >> documentation on Ocaml, especially if you don't have ocaml lesson. > > Yes and No. > The problem can be felt in PHP, where you see "anyone" witing > "anything". > So, yes, there should be more documents on Ocaml, but the problem > is: Only > inexperienced users have time to write down some "learning notes". > The real Gurus are all overbooked... > > It's also my wish to see some documentation, but on the other hand, > I dont > want it to fall into PHP fashion. Great dilemma... I generally agree, although the guru term is perhaps overused. I figure people do what they find enjoyable -- if someone who's very good at OCaml simply doesn't enjoy explaining it in the form of a manual or whatnot, there's no helping that, and it's surely understandable! Cheers, Kuba