English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and Boehm
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-04-11 (19:18)
From: Ed Keith <e_d_k@y...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and Boehm

--- On Sat, 4/11/09, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote:

> From: Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml and Boehm
> To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
> Date: Saturday, April 11, 2009, 10:27 AM
> Also, don't forget that many people incorrectly claim that smart pointers 
> deallocate at the earliest possible point when, in fact, they typically keep 
> values alive longer than necessary.

Could elaborate on this? I'm having a hard time envisioning a situation where GC could free memory that smart pointers would not free. 


Ed Keith

Blog: edkeith.blogspot.com