Browse thread
The state of ML: multi-threaded, saved state and support platforms
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Lucas Dixon <ldixon@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] The state of ML: multi-threaded, saved state and support platforms |
Florian Weimer wrote: > * Lucas Dixon: > >> 1. Which implementations have native system threads with shared memory? > > And are there any implementations which allow multiple worlds in a > single process, *without* shared memory? I was wondering if some systems implement message passing concurrency without shared memory. Seems quite reasonable to me. I think older thread libraries for PolyML has limits on the way memory was shared. best, lucas -- The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with registration number SC005336.