[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Virtual packages in findlib |
On Tue, Jul 07, 2009 at 11:07:55AM -0700, Dario Teixeira wrote:
> having an order-preserving Ocamlbuild would be moot if findlib
> supported some sort of virtual packages).
Can you explain that? I don't see why virtual packages can resolve
ordering problems.
(Following your analogy, the same problems exist with Debian packages:
if you have pre-dependencies which force an order among packages, you
cannot fix that by resorting to virtual packages.)
Cheers.
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime