Browse thread
ignoring toplevel phrases?
-
Roland Zumkeller
-
Ashish Agarwal
- Roland Zumkeller
- Richard Jones
-
Ashish Agarwal
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Roland Zumkeller <roland.zumkeller@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] ignoring toplevel phrases? |
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Ashish Agarwal<agarwal1975@gmail.com> wrote: > Just curious, why do you want this? I would like to save the state of the toplevel to the disk using serialization. As functions can't be serialized one could check at every "let" statement if there is a saved serialized value and if yes, take that, otherwise execute the let-body. Just complinig is not an option, since the *results* of previous computations should be saved, i.e. 120 as opposed to "fact 5".