Browse thread
Caml Light 0.8 and -fstrict-aliasing build issue
- Alexis ROBERT
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Alexis ROBERT <alexis.robert@g...> |
| Subject: | Caml Light 0.8 and -fstrict-aliasing build issue |
Hello, As the MPSI programme force us to use Caml Light instead of OCaml (our teachers hit us each time we pronounce ocaml :) ), I tried to build the sources on my computer, but during the build, I got this : make[1]: Entering directory `/home/alexis/camllight/src/lib' ../camlrun ../camlcomp -stdlib . -O none -g -W string.mli make[1]: *** [string.zi] Segmentation fault More precisely, gdb told me that : (gdb) run ../camlcomp -stdlib . -O none -g -W string.mli Starting program: /home/alexis/camllight/src/camlrun ../camlcomp -stdlib . -O none -g -W arg.mli Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. interprete (prog=0xe0e960 "\006\016") at interp.c:508 508 cur_instr = *pc++; <= In the real source code, that's Next; I changed it with the macro content for more lisibility :) (gdb) info locals pc = (code_t) 0x9 <Address 0x9 out of bounds> cur_instr = <value optimized out> [...] The reason of the segfaults seems to be linked with -fstrict-aliasing (included in -O2, I discovered it when disabling gcc optimizations to get cur_instr value). In fact, the weird thing is that pc pointer suddently decreases to 0x09, which doesn't seem to be a very sweet memory address, and causes a segfault in the Next macro when it deferences pc. I've tried to follow pc using a watchpoint before the magic change, but it disables the watchpoint every time it reaches a segment of code where pc is not defined which makes the debugging process *very* annoying :) A workaround would be to use OPTS="-fno-strict-aliasing" in runtime/Makefile line 5, but I don't know if it's very clean (or to disable direct jumping but that's even worse :D ). My computer is running Ubuntu 9.04 with gcc 4.3.3 and a x86_64 cpu (I used the CVS version of caml light). It _MAY_ be a x86_64 only issue as I vaguely remember a friend having the same configuration as mine using Ubuntu x86 who has successfully built caml light, but I may have forgot some details. Thanks ! Alexis ROBERT