Browse thread
Jane Street is hiring (as if you didn't already know)
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Romain Beauxis <toots@r...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Jane Street is hiring (as if you didn't already know) |
Hi ! Le lundi 17 août 2009 15:02:10, Alexy Khrabrov a écrit : > I believe that any OCaml job posting is such a cause to rejoice, that the > only event which comes less frequently is a Haskell job posting! :) You > have to be pretty heartless, or not planning to work as a functional > programmer for money, to not be delighted by those sensible and interesting > reminders from Yaron. He also makes them dynamic, keeping adding various > cities of the world to the mix! I am very happy to see OCaml being adopted widely, and in particular when it come to reliability which is the case here. Otherwise, I don't see the point in figthing with Haskell, but that's not the topic. Well, you know, not all the people have the same background. A job interest is very different than a technical interest. Hence, when discussing about jobs and this stuff, it can quickly show some huge differences. For instance, I don't think that OCaml's maintainers at INRIA have the same interests about the language than people in Janest. Nor the same income. Even more, some people contribute to OCaml in their spare time, which means they don't get money from it, and probably don't want. More over, although we are all here to discuss about the technical issues in OCaml, we don't all have the same ideas about external concerns, in particular finance in my case. However, even though my first message was probably a bit rude, I did not mean to argue in this topic. I don't believe this is a place for that, and, all in all, I wish all the best to other contributors to OCaml, although I do not necessarily like the application themselves. Hence, I would argue that a seperation in this topic would be a good thing to avoid furstrating people that have different background but would otherwise have very fruitful interactions in the pure field of technical concerns about OCaml. I also think it's been enough on this topic, for the very reasons I've just explained ! All the best, Romain