Browse thread
Re: [Caml-list] Physical counterpart to Pervasives.compare?
-
Pascal Cuoq
- Christophe Raffalli
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Physical counterpart to Pervasives.compare? |
> > But you should still do the comparison > with a unique C function written for this purpose. > If you tried to use a "convert address to int" function, > you would have a race condition between the conversion > of each address and garbage collection. Or, if all major GCs are compacting and the minor heap is at a higher adress than the major heap, then OCaml's could also preserve the adress order between GC ... How much slower is the compacting major GC comparer to the standard one ? Cheers, Christophe