Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Dario Teixeira
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-09-05 (10:52) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
On Saturday 05 September 2009 11:22:30 rixed@happyleptic.org wrote: > > Using a very simple analysis from > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_desktop_operating_systems, > > 97.14%[1] of the computers in the world run an OS which does not have a > > "Linux"-style package manager (very sad, but true). > > With OCaml you can distribute native code programs, so the installation > problem is relevant only to programmers. Don't bank on it. We shipped a product called Presenta a few years ago that was written in OCaml and distributed as a native code executable for Linux. It was a complete disaster with 80% of users experiencing random segfaults and we canned the product and will never try to distribute compiled OCaml programs again. Linux is basically a complete disaster in this regard because it offers so little binary compatibility between distros. Building upon a decent VM solves this problem and many others, of course, but Linux has none. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e