Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Dario Teixeira
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Rakotomandimby Mihamina <mihamina@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
09/05/2009 03:03 PM, Jon Harrop::
>>> Using a very simple analysis from
>>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_desktop_operating_systems,
>>> 97.14%[1] of the computers in the world run an OS which does not have a
>>> "Linux"-style package manager (very sad, but true).
>> With OCaml you can distribute native code programs, so the installation
>> problem is relevant only to programmers.
> Don't bank on it. We shipped a product called Presenta a few years ago that
> was written in OCaml and distributed as a native code executable for Linux.
> [...]
> Linux is basically a complete disaster in this regard because it offers so
> little binary compatibility between distros.
The same with Windows. Some executables are version-sticky.
<my really personnal opinion>
But if you really wanted to distribute for Linux, the least action is
to provide:
- a specfile for rpm packagin
- a debian/ directory for debian likes
That way, you'll get it right.
</p>
For example http://dev.coova.org/svn/coova-chilli/ has.
I think it's a good effort made.
--
Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat:
Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement
+261 34 29 155 34