Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
-
Dario Teixeira
-
Jon Harrop
- Stefano Zacchiroli
- Gaius Hammond
-
Jon Harrop
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Gaius Hammond <gaius@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
On 4 Sep 2009, at 01:08, Jon Harrop wrote: > I would very much like to learn batteries and write OCaml Journal > articles > about it. The main reason I have not is not just that it has not > reached 1.0 > yet but that it is not a mere "apt-get install" away for most users. This (for example) is what other language communities count as "batteries included": http://www.activestate.com/activepython/ No disrespect intended towards the Batteries guys, but if the goal is to encourage widespread adoption, that's what to aim for. Cheers, G