Browse thread
Scilab: Why not written in OCaml?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Philippe Wang <philippe.wang.lists@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Scilab: Why not written in OCaml? |
Why not use Bigloo? It's a efficient scheme compiler, also developed at INRIA. http://www-sop.inria.fr/mimosa/fp/Bigloo/ Just kidding, -- Philippe Wang mail@philippewang.info On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:23 PM, Jon Harrop <jon@ffconsultancy.com> wrote: > On Saturday 19 September 2009 08:39:14 Stéphane Lescuyer wrote: >> > ...and from INRIA's view I would think: they have developed >> > OCaml, but do not use it for their own developments.... >> > ... strange, isn't it? >> >> I think you don't quite realize how big an institute the INRIA is : >> >> http://www.inria.fr/inria/enbref.en.html > > On the contrary, the bigger INRIA is the more valuable it would be for them to > eat their own dog food. If OCaml had more users in INRIA it would garner more > useful feedback and would be more likely to get funding. > > -- > Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. > http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e >