Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries?
Great! I did not know this book was going to employ Batteries. That is a
great step towards making Batteries the standard library.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Alp Mestan <alp@mestan.fr> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> - Core language features are altered. For example, the Batteries way is to
>> use input's instead of in_channel's. Documentation explaining such changes
>> would help. The API documentation is excellent, but what is missing is a
>> book on "An Introduction to OCaml with Batteries". Perhaps a well planned
>> wiki would help get this started.
>>
>
> There's a French version : http://fr.wikibooks.org/wiki/Objective_Caml
> for which a translation had been started :
> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Objective_Caml but it isn't up-to-date at
> all, nor finished.
>
> Still, the missing thing is time...
>
>
> --
> Alp Mestan
> http://blog.mestan.fr/
> http://alp.developpez.com/
>