Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Dario Teixeira
-
Ashish Agarwal
-
Alp Mestan
- Ashish Agarwal
-
Alp Mestan
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-09-03 (20:38) |
From: | Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
Great! I did not know this book was going to employ Batteries. That is a great step towards making Batteries the standard library. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Alp Mestan <alp@mestan.fr> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>wrote: > >> - Core language features are altered. For example, the Batteries way is to >> use input's instead of in_channel's. Documentation explaining such changes >> would help. The API documentation is excellent, but what is missing is a >> book on "An Introduction to OCaml with Batteries". Perhaps a well planned >> wiki would help get this started. >> > > There's a French version : http://fr.wikibooks.org/wiki/Objective_Caml > for which a translation had been started : > http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Objective_Caml but it isn't up-to-date at > all, nor finished. > > Still, the missing thing is time... > > > -- > Alp Mestan > http://blog.mestan.fr/ > http://alp.developpez.com/ >