Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
-
Dario Teixeira
- Jon Harrop
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-09-03 (22:57) |
From: | Jon Harrop <jon@f...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
On Thursday 03 September 2009 15:35:20 Dario Teixeira wrote: > a) Lack of exposure to the advantages of Batteries. It borrows lots of > cool ideas from Haskell, but that may not be immediately apparent. Can you elaborate on this? > You guys should take advantage of the Ocaml Planet to run a publicity > campaign: you can make a number of tutorial posts showing the "old" > way versus the Batteries way. There's more to Batteries than just > a collection of APIs, and that message may not be getting through. I would very much like to learn batteries and write OCaml Journal articles about it. The main reason I have not is not just that it has not reached 1.0 yet but that it is not a mere "apt-get install" away for most users. -- Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e