Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
- kattla
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Dario Teixeira
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-09-04 (09:32) |
From: | Stéphane Glondu <steph@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
Pierre Etchemaite a écrit : >> I imagine there are a fair number of people who take parts bits and >> pieces out of the batteries sources and use those in their projects. > > I've seen this in too many OCaml projects indeed, and that approach > has its own problems too. Fixes and improvements do not flow from one > copy of the code to the other, codes eventually diverge and using the > "real" library becomes harder as time goes on... This is a maintainance > nightmare. [...] +1 > I think a broad availability (either installed by default or at least > *very* easy to install) on all supported platforms should be a > start. As I understand Batteries is getting there. I would say it's software distributions' goal (GODI, Debian, etc.). Cheers, -- Stéphane