Browse thread
Why don't you use batteries?
-
Edgar Friendly
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
- Alan Schmitt
-
kattla
- David Rajchenbach-Teller
- Vincent Aravantinos
- Dario Teixeira
- Ashish Agarwal
- Tom Hutchinson
- Richard Jones
- Jake Donham
- Jean-Christophe Filliâtre
- Sylvain Le Gall
- Philippe Wang
- Erik de Castro Lopo
- rixed@h...
- Philip
- Rakotomandimby Mihamina
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | David Rajchenbach-Teller <David.Teller@e...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Why don't you use batteries? |
Unfortunately, it still is. I hope that the compiler will eventually be fixed to avoid this kind of issue. Cheers, David On Thu, 2009-09-03 at 16:10 +0200, kattla wrote: > Hi, > > > 3) It makes my executables too big > > (Assuming this [0] is still true) > > For me this is the biggest reason for not using batteries. I don't > really have a need for small executables right now, but I would like > to at least know that this issue will be resolved before I adopt > batteries. > > > [0] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/ml-archives/caml-list/2008/11/24509ad16aae6d1cc2e15f532e0007eb.en.html > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >