>> I think
>> that an OCaml-like language that addresses OCaml's performance
>> (including
>> parallelism) and FFI issues would be much more widely useful and is an
>> entirely achievable goal.
>>
> I'm not as committed to abandoning OCaml as you seem, and have hope for
> incremental improvement of OCaml's weaknesses, although I realize we'll
> have to break a number of things to get to where we both (and likely
> many others) want to be.

Perhaps the future adoption of OCaml will
depend on what OCaml 4.0 is going to be like.
If Grand Central Dispatch makes its way
into *nix, then I think it is extremely
worthwhile for OCaml to have support for
something similar.

Kevin Cheung.