Browse thread
A strange typing error with polymorphic variants
-
Marc de Falco
-
Jake Donham
- Vincent Aravantinos
-
Jake Donham
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Vincent Aravantinos <vincent.aravantinos@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] A strange typing error with polymorphic variants |
Le 27 oct. 09 à 19:24, Jake Donham a écrit :
> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:28 AM, Marc de Falco <marc@de-falco.fr>
> wrote:
>> The following code :
>> type 'a p = R of 'a t | E of float
>> and 'a t = { mutable p : 'a p; c : 'a }
>> let f =
>> let x = sqrt(2.0) in
>> fun () -> { c = `A; p = E 0.0 }
>>
>> generates the error :
>> The type of this expression, unit -> _[> `A ] t,
>> contains type variables that cannot be generalized
>>
>> but if I change the x definition to "let x = 2.0 in" then it works.
>
> I think this is just the value restriction. The type of f is
> generalized only if the right hand side is a value (rather than an
> expression needing some computation); in your examples the one that
> fails is not a value, the others are. It looks like there is a
> relaxation to allow let bindings which are themselves values.
With the -dlambda option, the "sqrt(2.0)" version gives:
(let
(f/92
(let (x/93 (caml_sqrt_float 2.0))
(function param/94 (makemutable 0 [1: 0.0] 65a))))
whereas the "2.0" version gives:
(let (f/96 (let (x/97 2.0) (function param/98 (makemutable 0 [1:
0.0] 65a))))
i.e. this last version is inlined.
I thought the yping was done before (??)
V.