Browse thread
Improving OCaml's choice of type to display
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-10-09 (09:58) |
From: | Yaron Minsky <yminsky@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml's choice of type to display |
Well, if we're picking heuristics, the fewest number of characters wouldn't be crazy either. Given the choice between Int.t and Int.comparable (which are aliases for the same type), I'd prefer to see Int.t. y On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Andrej Bauer <andrej.bauer@andrej.com>wrote: > On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com> wrote: > > Choosing shorter names. > > By which you probably mean "the fewest number of dots (module > projections)". It might be a bit annoying if the code that prints > doesn't know what modules are open. What do the INRIA priests say? > > Andrej >