Browse thread
revised syntax for abstract types ?
-
Serge Leblanc
-
Nicolas Pouillard
- Stefano Zacchiroli
- Serge Leblanc
-
Nicolas Pouillard
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@u...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] revised syntax for abstract types ? |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 02:49:43PM +0100, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> Excerpts from Serge Leblanc's message of Thu Dec 10 12:56:44 +0100 2009:
> > Hi, the documentation for the revised syntax explain that abstract types
> > are expressed by :
>
> The documentation is too old
Any chance that it will be updated any time soon?
--
Stefano Zacchiroli -o- PhD in Computer Science \ PostDoc @ Univ. Paris 7
zack@{upsilon.cc,pps.jussieu.fr,debian.org} -<>- http://upsilon.cc/zack/
Dietro un grande uomo c'è ..| . |. Et ne m'en veux pas si je te tutoie
sempre uno zaino ...........| ..: |.... Je dis tu à tous ceux que j'aime