Browse thread
Re: OCaml is broken
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.1/8.0] Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml is broken |
On 2009-12-20, at 13:21, Erik Rigtorp wrote: > The first step for OCaml would be to be able to run multiple > communicating instances of the runtime bound to one core each in one > process and have them communicate via lock free queues. Does anyone know how to do lock-free queues in a weakly-consistent memory model? -- Damien