Browse thread
Re: OCaml is broken
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-12-22 (18:02) |
From: | Edgar Friendly <thelema314@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: multicore wish |
On 12/22/2009 01:12 PM, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Tuesday 22 December 2009 13:09:27 Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > >> The advantage with ocaml though is that you never have pointers into a >> structure. Makes thinks a lot simpler for the GC and avoids large >> overheads in memory. >> > I don't understand what you mean by OCaml "never has pointers into a > structure". Half the problem with OCaml is that OCaml almost always uses > pointers and the programmer has no choice, e.g. for complex numbers. > > I think he means that ocaml structs (records, tuples) will only ever have pointers pointing to their beginning - you can't have a pointer to somewhere in the middle of a structure. E