Browse thread
Re: OCaml is broken
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2009-12-22 (12:27) |
From: | Mihamina Rakotomandimby <mihamina@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.1/8.0] Re: [***SPAM*** Score/Req: 10.1/8.0] Re: [Caml-list] Re: OCaml is broken |
> Erik Rigtorp <erik@rigtorp.com> : > > Max/Min/Avg > > * Pipes: 28205/5973/6259 > > * Unix domain sockets: 44256/7748/8153 > > * SYSv message queues: 19197/5895/6173 > > * Posix message queues: 37399/10965/11303 > > * TCP on loopback: 29017/7471/7885 > Some more benchmarks: > Max/Min/Avg > * Spinlocking shm: 50897/403/761 (This one utilizes multiple cores, > since one core is just burning while waiting for data) > * Pthreads mutex shm: 27582/5246/6577 And, then... is OCaml "broken"? :-) -- Architecte Informatique chez Blueline/Gulfsat: Administration Systeme, Recherche & Developpement +261 34 29 155 34 / +261 33 11 207 36