Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
revised syntax for abstract types ?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] revised syntax for abstract types ?
Excerpts from Serge Leblanc's message of Thu Dec 10 12:56:44 +0100 2009:
> Hi, the documentation for the revised syntax explain that abstract types
> are expressed by :

The documentation is too old, abstract types now have the same syntax in
revised than in the original OCaml syntax.

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard
http://nicolaspouillard.fr