Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Romain Bardou wrote:
>> Hello, dear Caml-list,
>>
>> I have a file ast.mli. It has no .ml implementation as it contains only
>> type definitions.
> 
> 
> Then you should name that file ast.ml. Last time I tested (more than a
> year ago) n ast.ml file without corresponding ast.mli file is handled as
> if ast.mli was the output of ocamlc -i ast.ml.
> 
> Regards

Yes, this seems to be the easiest way. It's too bad that this implies
having a .cmo to link against just for some type definitions, though.

Thanks again,

-- 
Romain Bardou