Browse thread
Favorite OCaml editor?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Hugo Ferreira <hmf@i...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Favorite OCaml editor? |
To the OP: Eclipse + OcalIDE Alain Frisch wrote: > On 05/01/2010 09:13, Jon Harrop wrote: >> I think the best way to write a decent editor for OCaml would be to >> write one >> using LablGTK for the GUI and camlp4 to parse OCaml code. > > It is indeed very tempting to reuse an existing OCaml parser in order to > support syntax-related features (indentation, coloring, and whatnot); > especially if you can then support syntax extension properly. > > The problem is that the editor is supposed to work even with partial or > syntactically invalid code, which is not the case for the OCaml parsers > (built-in or Camlp4-based). It would be great to have a parser for OCaml > syntax, with robust error recovery. Has anyone worked on such a project? > > This is indeed a thorny issue. The developer of OcalIDE is taking another stab at this but this time using Camlp4 [1]. BTW the way the Haskell eclipse plug-in [2] also has to deal with such issues. In their case they use a generic library and API [3] that should be usable by any number of IDEs and editors (already used by emacs). May be of interest to you also. [1] http://ocaml.eclipse.free.fr/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=226 [2] http://eclipsefp.sourceforge.net/ [3] http://code.google.com/p/scion-lib/ Hugo F. > Alain > > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >