[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@w...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Alignment of data |
Pascal Cuoq <Pascal.Cuoq@cea.fr> writes:
> Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>
>
> You need to write a new function
>
> CAMLextern value caml_alloc_double_array (mlsize_t),
>
> or similar that ensures alignment on 8 byte for double even for 32bit
> systems.
>
> You should also check the CAMLextern value caml_copy_double (double);
> that it does the same.
>
>
> If you decide to go this route, which this message
> neither endorses not condemns, you also need to
>
> A1/ allocate the doubles directly in the major heap, and
> A2/ deactivate compactions
>
> or
>
> B/ modify the garbage-collector.
>
> Pascal
Doubles are tagged with Double_tag and arrays of doubles with
Double_array_tag. So the GCC knows where doubles are.
Would it be hard to patch the allocation to leave a 4 byte gap in the
minor heap when needed to align doubles and patch the compation to do
the same?
The 4 bytes would mean inserting an Atom(0) during allocation and
compaction. Not the nicest way to do this but should be simple to patch
in.
MfG
Goswin