[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-01-27 (21:20) |
From: | Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Alignment of data |
Pascal Cuoq <Pascal.Cuoq@cea.fr> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote: > > > You need to write a new function > > CAMLextern value caml_alloc_double_array (mlsize_t), > > or similar that ensures alignment on 8 byte for double even for 32bit > systems. > > You should also check the CAMLextern value caml_copy_double (double); > that it does the same. > > > If you decide to go this route, which this message > neither endorses not condemns, you also need to > > A1/ allocate the doubles directly in the major heap, and > A2/ deactivate compactions > > or > > B/ modify the garbage-collector. > > Pascal Doubles are tagged with Double_tag and arrays of doubles with Double_array_tag. So the GCC knows where doubles are. Would it be hard to patch the allocation to leave a 4 byte gap in the minor heap when needed to align doubles and patch the compation to do the same? The 4 bytes would mean inserting an Atom(0) during allocation and compaction. Not the nicest way to do this but should be simple to patch in. MfG Goswin