[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Olivier Andrieu <oandrieu@n...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] 2147483648l < 2147483647l |
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 13:59, Matej Kosik <kosik@fiit.stuba.sk> wrote: > Hello, > > I am sorry, I have a stupid question. > I would like to ask if this: > > # 2147483648l < 2147483647l;; > - : bool = true > > should not regarded as a bug. In my project I need Int32 value and above > behavior surprised me. Value > > 2147483648l > > should not be allowed at all because it cannot be encoded to 32-bit > signed integer encoded with 2's complement representation. > > Thanks in advance for help. yes that's a "misfeature" of the lexer/parser. The point is that it accepts -2147483648l (representable as an int32) ; the downside is that it accepts 2147483648l and treats it as -1l. Cf. this bug report: http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4210 . -- Olivier