Browse thread
Favorite OCaml editor?
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-01-05 (10:44) |
From: | Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Favorite OCaml editor? |
Excerpts from Alain Frisch's message of Tue Jan 05 11:27:07 +0100 2010: > On 05/01/2010 09:13, Jon Harrop wrote: > > I think the best way to write a decent editor for OCaml would be to write one > > using LablGTK for the GUI and camlp4 to parse OCaml code. > > It is indeed very tempting to reuse an existing OCaml parser in order to > support syntax-related features (indentation, coloring, and whatnot); > especially if you can then support syntax extension properly. > > The problem is that the editor is supposed to work even with partial or > syntactically invalid code, which is not the case for the OCaml parsers > (built-in or Camlp4-based). It would be great to have a parser for OCaml > syntax, with robust error recovery. Has anyone worked on such a project? Reusing the work done in the Yi [1][2] editor for the Haskell syntax should be pretty straightforward. Very long and painful however due to the complexity of the grammar of a real language. [1]: http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Yi [2]: http://www.cse.chalmers.se/~bernardy/FunctionalIncrementalParsing.pdf -- Nicolas Pouillard http://nicolaspouillard.fr