Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    
Browse thread
Ocaml implementation and low level details
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: -- (:)
From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@s...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml implementation and low level details
Konstantin Tcholokachvili wrote:
> Thank you for these infos, I will consider which solution fits the best 
> with my project: make a trade off, find a more suitable ML 
> implementation or stay  (sadly) with C.


You might also consider some safer system programming languages, like Cyclone or BitC.

You could also consider generating some "safer" C from some other, better, language...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_%28programming_language%29
http://cyclone.thelanguage.org/
http://www.bitc-lang.org/

Regards.

-- 
Basile STARYNKEVITCH         http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/
email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359
8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France
*** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***