Browse thread
Ocaml implementation and low level details
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-01-28 (17:47) |
From: | Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@s...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml implementation and low level details |
Konstantin Tcholokachvili wrote: > Thank you for these infos, I will consider which solution fits the best > with my project: make a trade off, find a more suitable ML > implementation or stay (sadly) with C. You might also consider some safer system programming languages, like Cyclone or BitC. You could also consider generating some "safer" C from some other, better, language... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyclone_%28programming_language%29 http://cyclone.thelanguage.org/ http://www.bitc-lang.org/ Regards. -- Basile STARYNKEVITCH http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/ email: basile<at>starynkevitch<dot>net mobile: +33 6 8501 2359 8, rue de la Faiencerie, 92340 Bourg La Reine, France *** opinions {are only mines, sont seulement les miennes} ***