[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-02-04 (08:33) |
From: | Yoann Padioleau <padator@w...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] typeclasses? |
On Feb 3, 2010, at 3:02 PM, Raoul Duke wrote: > > hi, Hi, > > is there a most-favored-implementation of typeclasses for OCaml? You mean how to solve in OCaml problems people solve using type-classes in haskell ? - For Eq, ocaml has a polymorphic = - For Ord, ocaml has a polymprohic < - For Show, there is sexplib, json-static, ocaml Dumper - Otherwise there is classes and module/functors, or just passing record containg functions, which can mimic sometimes what type classes provides. If you want real type-classes in OCaml, join the long list of people begging for Xavier-Leroy/Vouillon/Doligez/Guarrigue/real-programmers... to implement it (this list of begging people usually includes people who are too lazy/incompetent/afraid-to-look-in-ocaml-source to implement and rely on other busy people to do the job). > > thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >