Browse thread
The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
-
Saptarshi Guha
- Guillaume Yziquel
- Gerd Stolpmann
- Jon Harrop
-
Stefan Monnier
- Till Varoquaux
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-02-10 (22:25) |
From: | Till Varoquaux <till@p...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion |
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> wrote: >> Wouldn't one of way of detecting a recursive function would be to see >> if the indeed the function calls itself? > > That's what Haskell does, yes. > > Let's make things clear here: the "rec" *really* is a feature; it is very convenient to reuse the same identifier to express something in the process of being built (e.g. something going through a pipeline). For instance: let g () = let f s = if !debug then Printf.printf "f is called with value: %s\n%!" s f s in ....... Some (including me) would even argue that it is sad that type definitions don't use "rec". Till > Â Â Â Â Stefan > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >