Browse thread
WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
- Grant Rettke
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Grant Rettke <grettke@a...> |
| Subject: | WAS Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion |
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com> wrote: > let rec Do OCaml'er look at let rec more as being a message to the programmer, rather than the compiler, that the way I want to define this function is recursively so even if 'f' was previously bound you know which one I mean? Considering the language allows mutation, I feel like it is more for humans than the compiler, but of course, the compiler must be told, too.