Browse thread
The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
| Date: | -- (:) |
| From: | Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@g...> |
| Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Re: The need to specify 'rec' in a recursive function defintion |
It may be worth recalling the OCaml koans at http://eigenclass.org/hiki/fp-ocaml-koans. The first one is: let rec One day, a disciple of another sect came to Xavier Leroy and said mockingly: "The OCaml compiler seems very limited: why do you have to indicate when a function is recursive, cannot the compiler infer it?" Xavier paused for a second, and replied patiently with the following story: "One day, a disciple of another sect came to Xavier Leroy and said mockingly..." On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 9:42 AM, Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>wrote: > > It sure does, tho not with "fun" but only with "var" definitions. > ^^^ > val > > Stefan "blush!" > > _______________________________________________ > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management: > http://yquem.inria.fr/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/caml-list > Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs >