Browse thread
Shared memory parallel application: kernel threads
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-03-12 (11:56) |
From: | Hugo Ferreira <hmf@i...> |
Subject: | Shared memory parallel application: kernel threads |
Hello, I need to implement (meta) heuristic algorithms that uses parallelism in order to (attempt to) solve a (hard) machine learning problem that is inherently exponential. The aim is to take maximum advantage of the multi-core processors I have access to. To that effect I have revisited many of the lively discussions in threads related to concurrency, parallelism and shared memory in this mailing list. I however still have many doubts, some of which are very basic. My initial objective is to make a very simple tests that launches k jobs. Each of these jobs must access a common data set that is read-only. Each of the k threads in turn generates its own data. The data generated by the k jobs are then placed in a queue for further processing. The process continues by launching (or reusing) k/2 jobs. Each job consumes two elements from the queue that where previously generated (the common data set must still be available). The process repeats itself until k=1. Note that the queued data is not small nor can I determine a fixed maximum size for it. I have opted to use "kernel-level threads" that allow use of the (multi-core) processors but still allow "easy" access to shared memory". I have done a cursory look at: - Ocaml.Threads - Ocaml.Unix (LinuxThreads) - coThreads - Ocamlnet2/3 (netshm, netcamlbox) (An eThreads library exists in the forge but I did not examine this) My first concern is to take advantage of the multi-cores so: 1. The thread library is not the answer Chapter 24 - "The threads library is implemented by time-sharing on a single processor. It will not take advantage of multi-processor machines." [1] 2. LinuxThreads seems to be what I need "The main strength of this approach is that it can take full advantage of multiprocessors." [2] Issue 1 In the manual [3] I see only references to function for the creation and use of processes. I see no calls that allow me to simply generate and assign a function (job) to a thread (such as val create : ('a -> 'b) -> 'a -> t in the Thread module). The unix library where LinuxThreads is now integrated shows the same API. Am I missing something or is their no way to launch "threaded functions" from the Unix module? Naturally I assume that threads and processes are not the same thing. Issue 2 If I cannot launch kernel-threads to allow for easy memory sharing, what other options do I have besides netshm? The data I must share is defined by a recursive variant and is not simple numerical data. I would appreciate any comments. TIA, Hugo F. [1] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual038.html [2] http://pauillac.inria.fr/~xleroy/linuxthreads/ [3] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/libref/ThreadUnix.html [4] http://caml.inria.fr/pub/docs/manual-ocaml/manual035.html