[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-04-05 (15:41) |
From: | Daniel_Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] Forced linking and Ocamlbuild |
> (I realise there's always the option of adding a > dummy reference, but I'm looking for a cleaner solution). Is it really "unclean" ? Suppose you'd like to use ocamldoc to output a dot file to understand the dependencies of your program, if you manage to achieve what you want to do you'll miss that dependency. The more info there is in the source (vs. the build procedure) the easier it is to understand the program. Best, Daniel