Browse thread
new emacs tuareg mode release
[
Home
]
[ Index:
by date
|
by threads
]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: | 2010-05-29 (13:16) |
From: | David Baelde <david.baelde@e...> |
Subject: | Re: [Caml-list] New emacs tuareg mode |
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com> wrote: > Your first code block is a good example of non indented [let] blocks looking > good. Your second example should be indented as follows to clarify its > actual structure: > > if blah then > f () ; > g () ; > h () Right, this was a bad example, and I can't think of a good one. Maybe indentation can't help with that tricky syntax after all, and all I can say is "I prefer the way it looks that way" (which is no surprise since I've been learning OCaml under Tuareg). Cheers, -- David